Introduction/Context
From 2021 to 2024, major American media such as The New York Times and Washington Post, along with Democratic leaders, regularly warned of Trump’s authoritarianism and called January 6 an existential threat to democracy. Front-page headlines declared “democracy is on the ballot.” However, following Trump’s return in January 2025, this urgency largely vanished. Instead, technical and procedural reporting became the norm—even as federal executive overreach accelerated in dramatic new ways.
Beginning in early 2025, the Trump administration moved to unilaterally defund agencies overseen by Congress, slashing the Department of Education budget and revoking support for public universities, despite clear obstacles in Article I, Section 9 and the Impoundment Control Act. During the same period, a wave of administrative detentions and deportations targeted students and faculty engaged in protected expressive activity, not criminal acts. For example, Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student, was held for publishing a pro-Palestinian op-ed, but was released by court order with no criminal charges ever filed[NPR: May 9, 2025]. Dr. Rasha Alawieh, a Brown University professor of medicine, was deported after attending a public funeral in Lebanon for Hassan Nasrallah; likewise, no criminal charges were filed[NYT: Mar 16, 2025]. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student, was detained and threatened with deportation for campus protest activity, also absent criminal charges [Guardian: March, 19 and NYT, March, 16]. The common thread was the use of immigration discretion and “foreign policy” grounds rather than criminal prosecution.
Further intensifying executive control, Trump filed suit in July 2025 against The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch, and several reporters seeking over $10 billion in damages, targeting coverage of Trump’s alleged correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. At the time of writing, court proceedings are ongoing, and the Journal stands by its reporting.
The Federalized Policing Surge: Los Angeles and D.C.
In June 2025, ICE raids in Los Angeles led to over 2,000 detentions—including lawful residents and citizens—and were carried out with federalized California National Guard support, despite strong objections from Governor Gavin Newsom and city leaders[NPR: June 8, 2025]. These deployments were justified by “emergency” claims contradicted by crime data and local testimony. Legal challenges were launched, but coverage often treated the episode as a matter of logistics and legality rather than an assault on democratic norms.
D.C. soon followed: Trump federalized the Metropolitan Police and deployed more than 800 National Guard troops—despite D.C.’s violent crime rate dropping 26% in 2025, a fact that the major outlets noted only parenthetically. Immigration checkpoints, federal patrols at metro stations, and overt federal command over local law enforcement became everyday realities. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, among others, mounted legal pushback, but news coverage highlighted technical disputes over Home Rule and control, not the unprecedented nature of the federal intervention.
No Emergency, No Precedent
Unlike President Johnson’s deployment of the Alabama National Guard to Selma in 1965 under the Insurrection Act—to uphold federally protected rights—2025’s deployments were based on manufactured “emergencies,” not real insurrections or statutory violations. Legal historians have pointed out that never before in U.S. peacetime has federalized law enforcement occupied major cities absent congressional action, judicial order, or clear local threat.
Indeed, even during the actual emergency of January 6, 2021, the executive did not invoke the Insurrection Act or deploy troops to protect Congress, despite direct requests from congressional leaders and Vice President Pence.
Media Coverage: Fact-Checking but Little Alarm
While The New York Times and Washington Post published statistics showing declining crime in D.C. and fact-checked Trump’s “emergency” rhetoric, their coverage remained procedural—focused on federal vs. local control disputes and administrative technicalities. The historic breach—deploying federal police to cities on fabricated justification—was rarely framed as a constitutional crisis. Instead, outlets often normalized the extraordinary, describing "friendly troops," "cooperative" metros, and focusing on legal mechanics, not democratic warning signs.
Major Press and Agency Intimidation Actions (2025)
-
Press pool bans and changes excluded AP, Reuters, and Bloomberg over disputes about White House-approved terminology; AP litigation secured only partial reinstatement.
- FCC investigations were launched into CNN, NPR, PBS, and MSNBC, while executive orders cut funding to public broadcasters, amplifying the chilling effect on critical coverage.
Trump filed a multi-billion dollar suit against The Wall Street Journal, Murdoch, and reporters for coverage of his ties to Epstein; the case remains pending.
- Lawsuits targeted the Des Moines Register for election forecast reporting, and Voice of America/USAGM faced continue litigation and injunctions.
Watchdog organizations CPJ and RSF reported a marked increase in newsroom self-censorship, access restrictions, and legal intimidation in 2025.
Patronage for Loyalists
Meanwhile, loyalty was rewarded: Fox News and pro-administration media figures were chosen for senior administration posts (e.g., Pete Hegseth at Defense, Tulsi Gabbard at Intelligence, Sean Duffy at Transportation, Jeanine Pirro at D.C. prosecution). This quid pro quo heightened the pressure on competitors to avoid confrontation and preserve access.
Public Resistance and Institutional Pushback
Despite constraints, protests in Los Angeles and sustained legal challenges in D.C. and California reflect meaningful resistance to executive overreach[NPR: June 8, 2025]. Mayor Bowser, Newsom, and advocacy groups continue to press the courts, while public activism signals a growing backlash.
The Feedback Loop
A clear dynamic has emerged: bold, unprecedented executive actions meet muted, technical media coverage. With every normalization, Trump escalates further—deploying more federal forces and further stretching constitutional boundaries. This feedback loop is driven by legal intimidation, technical reporting, and selective patronage—slowly eroding democratic guardrails.
Conclusion
The deployment of federal troops and police to major cities without credible emergency, the chilling of adversarial journalism, and the selective empowerment of supporters together threaten core democratic norms. Visa cancellations, defunding, and lawsuits now stand alongside policing crackdowns as tools of executive expansion. Whether through citizen activism, legal challenge, or a reinvigorated Fourth Estate, Americans must disrupt this feedback loop to legitimize constitutional limits and preserve democratic accountability.
Endnotes
-NYT, “White House Ends Regular Reporting Slot for Independents,” April 2025.
-Reuters, “White House limits newswire access,” April 16, 2025.
-NYT, “White House removes wire services from press pool,” April 16, 2025.
Deadline, “White House Bans Reuters & Bloomberg,” April 16, 2025.
-NPR, “Trump administration vetting all 55 million visa holders,” Aug 21, 2025.
-NYT, “Tracking Lawsuits Against Trump’s Agenda,” Feb 12, 2025.
-NPR, “FTC's retaliation against Media Matters blocked,” Aug 16, 2025.
-Newsweek, “Full List of Fox News Personalities Serving in Trump Administration,” May 10, 2025.
-NPR, “Trump taps 19 Fox pundits and producers for second term,” Jan 20, 2025.
-ABC News, “Trump appoints Fox News host Jeanine Pirro,” May 8, 2025.
-RSF Report, “Press Freedom in US: 2025 overview,” June 2025.
-Committee to Protect Journalists, “Trump’s impact on U.S. press freedoms,” May 4, 2025.
-Reporters Without Borders, “US Press Freedom 2025,” May 4, 2025.
NYT, “Trump’s Budget Showdown with Congress,” 2025; CRS reports.
-NPR, “Trump lawsuit against Murdoch and Wall Street Journal turns personal,” July 29, 2025.
-NYT, “Trump Takes Control of D.C. Police, Citing ‘Bloodthirsty Criminals.’ But Crime Is Down,” Aug 11, 2025.
-NYT, “Trump Misstates Washington Crime Data to Justify Takeover,” Aug 12, 2025.
-NYT, “The D.C. Takeover,” Aug 12, 2025.
-WaPo, “Trump says crime in D.C. is out of control. Here’s what the data shows,” Aug 10, 2025.
-Politico, “Trump may send National Guard to Chicago, New York,” Aug 22, 2025.
-Brennan Center, “One Week of Trump’s DC Takeover Attempt,” Aug 19, 2025.
-Center for American Progress, “President Trump’s Recent Actions in DC,” Aug 18, 2025.
-[NPR: May 9, 2025] NPR, “Tufts student Rumeysa Ozturk ordered freed from immigration detention,” May 9, 2025.
-[NYT: Mar 16, 2025] NYT, “Brown University’s Rasha Alawieh, Professor, Deported After Funeral,” March 16, 2025.
-[NPR: June 8, 2025] NPR, “National Guard deployed in California immigration protests,” June 8, 2025.
-Reuters,
“Trump sues Wall ST. Journal over Epstein report, seeks $10 billion,"
July19, -2025Freedom Forum, “Trump Sues Wall Street Journal: First
Amendment Analysis,” July 21, 2025.
-Deadline, “Trump Claims Wall Street Journal Wants To Settle Defamation Lawsuit,” July 29, 2025.
-NPR, “National Guard deployed in California immigration protests,” June 8, 2025.
-NYT, “Brown University’s Rasha Alawieh, Professor, Deported After Funeral,” March 16, 2025.
-NYT, "How Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia Student Activist, Landid in Federal Detention," March 16, 2025
-The Guardian, "I am a Palestinian Political prisoner in the US. I am being targeted for my activism," March 19, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment